Cat

The cat remains true to itself, a self-sufficient feminine animal historically associated with goddesses such as Artemis and Bastet. In dreams, the cat can symbolize "feminine instinct"—a trait even more pronounced in large cats like the tiger or panther. Like many goddesses, the cat is also connected to the moon.

During the Middle Ages, cats became targets of projections of witchcraft and evil, which linked them to superstitions. At the same time, they were also tied to erotic desire and unapologetic lust, a likely reason for their association with goddesses such as Freyja.

The cat’s unique bond with humans, its apparent sensitivity to human emotions, and its usefulness in controlling pests may explain its depiction as a protective symbol in ancient cultures like Egypt. Like many other animal symbols, the cat oscillates between representing benevolence and malevolence.

The cat allows itself to be stroked and fed by humans but will leave if it becomes bored. It is a playful animal that can see at night and is associated with intuition and the supernatural.

A defining trait of the cat is that it is the least domesticated of all domestic animals. It is equally at home in the house and the wild, moving freely and independently between these realms.

The saying that a cat has nine lives reflects the belief that, as a symbol, it is associated with immortality. Cats have been viewed as mediums or mediators between worlds or opposites.

In fairy tales, cats that assist humans are almost always male and exhibit "almost mercurial traits," acting as guides, according to von Franz (2002, pp. 62–63). Female cats are more often associated with the moon and related qualities.

Like other animals, the cat can symbolize humanity's potential to be "at one with itself"—a unity of spirit and body. As a domesticated animal like the dog, the cat’s symbolic implications suggest that this possibility lies relatively close to consciousness. However, cats generally embody a higher degree of independence and femininity than dogs.


Popular posts from this blog

Forget About the Archetype - It's the Complex

A good post on Reddit expresses criticism towards people seeking answers to their personal problems in Jung’s archetype theory, arguing that they misunderstand Jung’s fundamental theoretical framework, particularly the process of individuation. The post became popular, receiving many upvotes and quickly garnering several fairly lengthy, often well thought-out responses. But what struck me was that the writer didn’t mention complexes a single time in the nearly 600-word post, and no one else did either in their comments. This prompted me to write a short post highlighting the point that when people share their thoughts on Jung in relation to their own or others’ psychology, it is actually, in most cases, about complexes—not archetypes. A couple of days later, the thread had 54 comments and 246 upvotes, which are rather high numbers in this forum for a serious post that sticks to the topic of Jungian psychology. However, my post hadn't received any comments or upvotes. Still no-one e...
Read more

Shadow Work – A Critical Commentary

When browsing public channels on various platforms that deal with Jungian psychology, one is struck by how frequently “shadow work” appears.  It seems to be mostly young men, who don’t appear to have studied Jung to any significant extent, who are fascinated by and encourage this "work." As someone who has studied Jung and Jungian literature for a long time, I don’t recognize this focus on so-called shadow work in the sources at all. It actually seems to be a modern internet phenomenon rather than something genuinely Jungian. Yes, it is of course true that the “shadow” is a central concept in Jungian psychology, and it is true that Jung stated that it is "a therapeutic necessity for the ego to confront its shadow" (CW 14, par. 514) – but this shadow work they speak of, where does it come from? Because it certainly doesn’t come from Jung or any influential Jungians. What is the shadow according to Jung? It is simply hidden or unconscious aspects of ourselves that we...
Read more

3. The Muster of Rohan; 4. The Siege of Gondor

Since neither Frodo, Gandalf or Aragorn participates in the events of this chapter, there is very little symbolic significance. We may note that Théoden’s army meets Éowyn at Dunharrow, an ancient fortress to which the people have fled under her leadership. During supper, Merry asks about Aragorn and the Paths of the Dead, but no one—neither Théoden, Éomer or Éowyn—understands why he chose to take this hopeless road. No one knows of the Stone of Erech or the “peril in the south.” “Woe that so valiant a man should trifle with death in this dire hour!” Éomer exclaims. The reason for Aragorn’s reticence is probably that his initiation is an intensely private matter, a secret pure and simple. Théoden intends to leave both Éowyn and Merry behind here—neither of them is suited to battle, he believes. But when the host later rides toward Gondor, Éowyn and Merry ride with it in secret. Both refuse to be left in a place where their respective callings would remain unfulfilled. 4. The Siege of G...
Read more